We are still in Michigan. Today we got an introduction the the Umich Center for Ultrafast Optical Science. They have a laser that is capable of achieving the highest intensities of any laser in the world. The idea of the laser is to take a short pulse, then pass it through a series of optical components that induce a chirp. This has the effect of broadening out the pulse. Then the broader pulse can be amplified and the pulse can be made into a short pulse again. The reason that this technique is necessary is because if you just start with a short pulse and try amplify them, the pulse becomes too strong for the amplifier. So in this method of chirped amplification, the pulse is broadened out and amplified. Since the pulse is broadened, any one place doesn't have a particularly high energy.
I thought that this was a cool device because it is able to probe new properties of materials by subjecting them to a high electric field. We also talked about lab safety today and got to see the laser described above. This laser has the acronym HERCULES. I find it amusing that they choose such acronyms.
One issue that I have had with a lot of physics research that I have seen is that it seems like a large amount of attention is given to achieving new extremes: lower temperature, higher pressure, higher intensity, etc. It is hard for me to see that just increasing the strength of our tools really gives us practical knowledge. I asked on of the professors about this issue. He gave a satisfying response. He noted that for this particular area of high intensity lasers, they are reaching the point where the laser could induce pair production in vacuum. That is to say, if you take a space with nothing in it, and subject it to a very large electric field, then an electron-positron pair emerges from seemingly nowhere. I am not sure if this is correct, but it seems that the energy from the electric field goes into creating the electron and positron. This raises the question: if we have a vacuum, do is there actually nothing there? From this, it seems like an electric field does count as something there.
Tomorrow, we are going to be making a hologram. I am looking forward to this. We also are going to be giving presentations about what we think our research is going to be about. The other students seem to be saying that they haven't gotten to reading the papers that their research mentors sent to them. I find it a bit strange that people wouldn't be more responsible about this. However, I am sure that people will get on top of their work.
Besides that, I have been having a good time meeting all of the other students and hanging out with them. Among other things, I hung out with people and tossed a Frisbee around. I do hope to get some more exercise during the trip. Some of the other guys are interested in Frisbee and apparently there is an exercise room at the place where we are staying. We also went out as a group to a Mexican restaurant and had a good time. I definitely feel like I have meet a group of people with whom I would enjoy doing a lot of site seeing. It seems like a bunch of people really want to go see as many countries as possible during their time in Europe. Personally, I would enjoy visiting two or three places and then spending the rest of the weekends in Paris. I think that if we are traveling every weekend, it will get tiring and we won't actually get to see a lot of stuff in the countries that we are visiting. However, we will see how this pans out.
Overall, I am very excited about my trip and the people that I am with. I am looking forward to a great summer.
I have a lot of friends who've gone to Europe, and they all said that it's incredibly easy to simply use English all the time...don't let all your years of learning French go to waste!! Parler en Français!
ReplyDeleteI think we should get HERCULES for the TKE basement!
ReplyDeleteHow do we really create a vacuum, though? Doesn't all space have something in it, some sort of molecule somewhere? I don't really understand the idea of there being space with nothing in it. Something has to be in it to reflect light off of, otherwise we would not be able to see anything in it. When we shine light in a vacuum, do we just not see the light until it emerges from the other side? Maybe that's a silly question.
ReplyDeleteAnd how large of an electric field does HERCULES create?
Is that what you were talking to John about for that long while?
Also, some of us were not given any papers or even contacted in return by our mentors. I know that I sent Victor an email but received no response back. Ginny got a response, but they basically told her to go to a website where it talks about a group that isn't the one we'll be working with and just says what the goals of that group are. The goals aren't really anything physical, either, they're just "generate particle beams and study stuff". You're one of the lucky students who actually got papers to read and has a general idea of what you'll get to do.
Well I don't think that the idea of a vacuum is well-understood (I have heard that some people think that there is actually something in a vacuum). I don't know quite what you mean by does there have to be something for the light to reflect off of. As far as I know, light does not need a medium to propagate through. But I am not sure that I understand what you mean. Also wikipedia says that a vacuum is space with no particles in it and that has no pressure. This is a more experimental definition. However, it is unclear if a vacuum can have energy in it...
ReplyDeleteI asked John a bit about group delay and stuff in the papers. Steven was asking John about this stuff during the dinner at the restaurant.
I do agree that it is nice that I have some papers to look at...
So are you basically trying to experimentally show stuff that's predicted in quantum field theory?
ReplyDelete